The petitioner complained that he was arrested on 27.06.2007 around 11.30 a.m. while he was on his way to attend a funeral in the Neluketiya area and that at the time he was arrested the,1st respondent had assaulted him. The petitioner accordingly alleged that due to the aforementioned action his fundamental rights guaranteed in terms of Articles 11, 13(1) and 13(2) of the Constitution had been infringed for which this Court had granted leave to proceed. Although leave to proceed was granted on Articles 11, 13(1) and 13(2) of the…
Read MoreTag: Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
Amarasinghe Arachchige Mangalasiri Amarasinghe, vs P.M. Seneviratne, Inspector of Police,Anil Priyantha, Headquarters Inspector, S.C. (F/R) No. 264/2006
The Petitioner is an Anesthetist, attached to the Base Hospital Dambulla and was also the Chief Organizer of the United National Party for Dodangaslanda. The 1st Respondent is an Inspector of Police of the Kurunegala Police Station. The 2nd Respondent is the Head Quarters Inspector of the Kurunegala Police Station. The Petitioner alleges that he was assaulted by the 1st Respondent inside the Kurunegala Police Station premises on 21.06.2006 and as such the Petitioner’s Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 11 of the Constitution have been infringed. The primary issue to…
Read MoreSAMARAKOON AND OTHERS VS UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND OTHERS | 2005 1SLR 119
Fundamental Rights – Petitioners who qualified to join Medical Faculty from Kandy District according to policy declared in Hand Book excluded – Legitimate expectations – Article 12(1) of the Constitution. According to the Hand Book for the academic year 2000/2001 published by the University Grants Commission (UGC) it was declared that 900 places will be available for intake of students to medical faculties of all the Universities in this country. Out of this number and as per the marking scheme, 54 places had to be allocated to the Kandy District.…
Read MoreFAROOK VS DHARMARATNE, CHAIRMAN, PROVINCIAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UVA AND OTHERS | 2005 1SLR 133
The petitioner who was in Grade l-l of the Sri Lanka Principals’ Service was not eligible to apply for the post of Principal of Sir Razick Fareed Maha Vidyaiaya. Flowever, with the support of the Provincial Chief Minister of the Uva Province, he first became Principal of Liyanagahawela Tamil Vidyaiaya for which he was not eligible and thereafter by deceit and with the support of the Provincial Ministry of Education he obtained an appointment as Principal of Razick Fareed Maha Vidyaiaya. When the 05th respondent the Provincial Director of Education,…
Read MoreERANDAKA AND ANOTHER V HALWELA, OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, POLICE STATION, HAKMANA AND OTHERS
The two petitioners were arrested on the morning of 14.8.2001 by the 2nd and 3rd respondent police officers and other police officers for alleged theft of a water pump. They were examined by a medical officer of a hospital at noon the same day who found no injuries on them. The same day they were produced before a Magistrate who remanded them until 23.8.2001. Thereafter they complained to court that they were assaulted by the 2nd and 3rd respondents and another police officer at the police station and also by…
Read MoreLama Hewage Lal DECEASED 1. Wewalage Rani Fernando (wife of the deceased) 2. Lama Hewage Janaka, 3. Lama Hewage Sampath 4. Lama Hewage Malsha Nadeeshani (Minor children of the deceased, appearing through their mother) Wewalage Rani Fernando (Guardian an-Litem) All of No. 90/1, Medawatte, Seeduwa South, Seeduwa PETITIONERS vs. 1. Officer – in – Charge, Minor Offences, Seeduwa Police Station, Seeduwa. 2. Officer – in –Charge, Police Station, Seeduwa. 3. Ratnayake, Officer – in – Charge, Negombo Prison, Negombo. 4. The Chief Jailer, Negombo Prison, Negombo. 5. Superintendent of Prison, Negombo Prison, Negombo. 6. Inspector of General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Colombo-1 7. Commissioner General of Prison, |
This is an application filed by the wife and three minor children of one Lama Hewage Lal who was arrested by the officials of the Seeduwa Police Station. Subsequently he had died whilst in the custody of the Negombo Prison Officials. The Petitioners alleged that the said Lama Hewage Lal (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) died as a result of torture while in detention and therefore at a time when he was deprived of his personal liberty. They have prayed for a declaration that the deceased’s fundamental rights guaranteed…
Read MoreSRIYANI SILVA v IDDAMALGODA, OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, POLICE STATION PAIYAGALA AND OTHERS | 2003 2SLR 63
The petitioner is the widow of an army deserter (deceased) against whom there was also an open warrant signed by the Magistrate for possession of illicit liquor and distilling equipment. On 12.06.2000 the 2nd respondent OIC (Crimes) Paiyagala Police Station, arrested the deserter and took him to the police station where he was detained until the 17th. The petitioner and deceased’s mother and sister stated that they visited the deceased on 12th, 13th, 14th and 15th and observed the deceased being assaulted and with serious injuries. The deceased also told…
Read MoreGuneththige Misilin Nona, Akkara Heththedeka, vs Muthubanda (10312), Police Constable Moragahahena Police Station, Moragahahena. Maheepala, Officer in Charge, S.C. (F/R) No. 429/2003
The 1st and the 2nd Petitioners are respectively the mother and sister of the deceased Thisera Sunil Hemachandra who died on 26th July 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the deceased), while allegedly in Police custody. The deceased was a Sri Lankan citizen and 32 years of age at the time of his death. The 1st Respondent was a Police constable attached to the Police Station at the time of the death of the deceased. The 2nd Respondent is the Officer in Charge of the Police Station. The 3rd Respondent is…
Read MoreSIRIMAL AND OTHERS v BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CO-OPERATIVE WHOLESALE ESTABLISHMENT AND OTHERS | 2003 2SLR 23
The petitioners complained that the 1st respondent (‘The CWE”) did in violation of their rights under Article 12(1) of the Constitution stopped extension of their services beyond 55 years and purported to retire them from 31.7.2002, by circular dated 21.6.2002(P6). The previous circular dated 14.11.1995(P5) provided for granting of annual extension from 55 until 60 as in the case of the public sector under Chapter V section 5 of the Establishments Code. The reasons given for the new policy decision were: (a) Redundant labour force (b) Heavy losses; and (c)…
Read MoreVELU ARASADEVI V PREMATILAKA AND OTHERS S C F R 4 0 1 /2 0 0 1
T h e p e titio n er w a s s to p p e d at a c h e c k poin t a n d a llo w e d to g o h o m e . Later r e s p o n d e n ts (P o lic e/A rm y O fficers) h a d c o m e h o m e a n d o r d er e d h er to a c c o m p…
Read More