In a separate article, I reported a recently delivered judgment by the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka regarding an arbitrary termination of broadcast by the Rupavahini Corporation in 2008. The purpose of this article is not to recapture the findings of that judgment but to go into some of the factual information reconfirmed by the judgment. A Rupavahini Program invited three panelists to discuss some matters of public interest, relating to a gazetted notification. It announced some new regulations relating to broadcasting. While the panel discussion was going on, the…
Read MoreAuthor:
tc10
www.slcat.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/10.TC.pdf
Read Moretc9
www.slcat.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/09.TC.pdf
Read Moretc8
www.slcat.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/08.TC.pdf
Read Moretc7
www.slcat.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/07.TC.pdf
Read MoreTC6
www.slcat.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/06.TC.pdf
Read Moretc5
www.slcat.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/05.TC.pdf
Read Moretc4
www.slcat.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/04.TC.pdf
Read Moretc3
www.slcat.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/03TC.pdf
Read Moretc2
www.slcat.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/02.TC.pdf
Read More